Cotton Grove Resolutions: Difference between revisions

From Landmark
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Protected "Cotton Grove Resolutions" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)))
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<big>
As a matter of history,  
As a matter of history,  


I copy them from the minutes, which were offered in the form of "queries."
From the minutes, which were offered in the form of "queries."


"Rev. J. R. Graves offered the following questions:
"Rev. J. R. Graves offered the following questions:
Line 26: Line 27:


but are arrayed in direct and bitter opposition to them?"
but are arrayed in direct and bitter opposition to them?"


These queries were unanimously answered in the negative, and the Baptists of Tennessee generally,
These queries were unanimously answered in the negative, and the Baptists of Tennessee generally,

Latest revision as of 00:16, 3 April 2024

As a matter of history,

From the minutes, which were offered in the form of "queries."

"Rev. J. R. Graves offered the following questions:

"1st. Can Baptists, consistently with their principles or the Scriptures,

recognize those societies not organized according to the pattern of the Jerusalem Church,

but possessing different governments, different officers, a different class of members, different ordinances,

doctrines and practices, as churches of Christ?

"2d. Ought they to he called gospel churches, or churches in a religious sense?

"3d. Can we consistently recognize the ministers of such irregular and unscriptural bodies as gospel ministers?

"4th. Is it not virtually recognizing them as official ministers to invite them into our pulpits,

or by any other act that would or could be construed into such a recognition?

"5th. Can we consistently address as brethren those professing Christianity,

who not only have not the doctrine of Christ and walk not according to his commandments,

but are arrayed in direct and bitter opposition to them?"


These queries were unanimously answered in the negative, and the Baptists of Tennessee generally,

and multitudes all over the South, endorsed the decision.

--