CHAPTER XI
CHAPTER XI. - - - - - Old Landmarkism, J.R. Graves
What it is not, and what is,
to be an old Landmark Baptist—
The true mission of old Landmark Baptist.
"Now I entreat you, brethren,
to watch those who are making factions and laying snares,
contrary to the teachings which you have learned;
and turn away from them.
For such like ones as they,
are not in subjection to our anointed Lord,
but their own appetites;
and by a kind and complementary words the decedent hearts of the unsuspecting."
(Rom.16:17,18.)
"Be not a partaker and other men’s sins: keep thyself pure" (1 Tim 5:22).
"If anyone comes to you,
and brings not this doctrine,
do not receive him into your handles,
nor wish him success;
for he who wishes him success partakes in his evil works"
(2 John 10:11). (Translation of Emphatic Diaglott)
"Can two walk together; except they be agreed?" (Amos 3:3).
Landmark Baptist are continually charged
by all who oppose their characteristic principles and policy—
Baptists who know better, not excepted—with many and grievous offenses,
in order to make us obnoxious to our own brethren and,
and detested by all others.
It seems proper, therefore, at this point,
to refute all these, by stating, first, what Old Landmarkism is not,
before making a summary of what it is.
1. Old Landmarkism is not the denial of spiritual regeneration
to those with whom we decline to associate ministerially or ecclesiastically.
Still we by no means feel warranted in saying
that we believe that the members of those societies,
which hold and teach that baptism is a sacrament or seal of salvation,
or essential to the remission of sins—
as all Pedobaptists and Campbellite societies do hold and teach—
are Christians,
or even presumptively regenerate,
since they do not require a credible evidence of regeneration as a condition of membership.
They may believe that baptism, "duly administered,"
confers the grace of regeneration upon adults and infants as well,
but Baptist do not,
and, therefore we cannot believe that because they are members,
it is therefore probable that they are regenerate,
as we are justified in believing with respect to Baptist Churches
that require a credible profession of regeneration in every instance.
It must be true that the vast mass of Pedobaptists,
and the overwhelming mass of the membership of Campbellite societies are unregenerate,
and we are not justified in applying to them the title of brethren in Christ;
for we will thereby mis-teach them,
and brethren, ecclesiastically, we know they are not.
But Landmarkism does not pretend to sit in judgment upon the state of any man’s heart,
but upon his ecclesiastical relations only.
Refusing to affiliate with them, ministerially and ecclesiastically,
is not declaring by our act that we believe their ministers and members are unregenerate,
but that they are not members of scriptural Churches.
Refusing to invite their ministers to preach for our churches,
and to accept their immersions,
is no more denying their Christian character
than refusing to invite them to our communion table—
Baptist know this, and all Pedobaptists shouls know it.
We mean by our refusal, to emphasize our protest against their organizations as scriptural churches,
and consequently against their ministers as authorized to preach
and to administer the church ordinance’s.
We do not recognized unbaptized and unordained men,
who are Baptists in sentiment, as scriptural ministers,
and qualified to administer Church ordinances;
and why should we be expected to recognize those we regard as disqualified,
and who violently oppose our faith and practice?
It is manifestly inconsistent in Baptists to do so,
and Pedobaptists know and freely admit it.
In all mere Christian duties, as private Christians,
we are at liberty to participate, but never ministerially or ecclesiastically.
By no act that can possibly be so construed,
must we recognize other societies as Christian churches,
or other ministers as Scriptural ministers.
2. Landmarkism is not the denial of the honesty and conscientiousness of Pedobaptists and Campbellites.
We concede to all the honesty of purpose we claim for ourselves,
and we accord to them equal conscientiousness;
but we, nevertheless, belief them honestly deceived,
and conscientious in the belief of unscriptural and pernicious errors;
and that it is our bounden duty to undeceive them by all possible scriptural means;
but by no word or deed of ours to confirm them in their error.
It is the highest proof of love to endeavor,
even at the hazard of losing their friendship,
to correct the mistakes and errors of our friends;
while to leave them unwarned of a danger of which we are aware, is the part of an enemy.
3. Landmarkism is not a proof of our uncharitableness.
We are charged with manifesting a spirit uncharitable and un-Christlike.
This charge is without foundation.
Christ called Himself the "truth;"
He hated and opposed all error;
he failed not upon all occasions to rebuke and denounced it;
He recognized only those as His friends who were like Him in this respect.
Charity not only rejoices in the truth,
but is opposed to that which is not truth,
and "hateth every false way."
Christ, nor charity, then, requires of us to surrender Christian principle,
and to be unfaithful to the teachings and requirements of duty.
We cannot hope to please Christ, by recognizing the institutions and traditions of men,
as equal to His own churches and Commandments.
That is not Christian charity,
but a false liberality and treason to Christ,
to surrender or compromise that which He has committed to us to firmly hold and faithfully teach.
Landmarkism, then, is not opposed to the spirit of true Christian charity,
but to an unscriptural and pernicious "liberalism"
which is being palmed off upon the world for Christian charity—
a spirit which is truly opposed to Christ,
and is the "bane and the curse of a pure Christianity,"
and daily demonstrates itself as the very spirit of persecution itself.
4. Landmarkism is not the denial to others the civil right,
or the most perfect liberty to exist as professed churches,
or to their ministers to preach their views, as it is falsely asserted.
We accord to all denominations and to all "religions," Jews and Gentiles, Mohammedan and Pagan,
the same right to exist;
and to their priests and teachers the same civil right to teach and propagate their doctrines,
as we claim for ourselves.
It is one of the peculiar characteristics of Baptists,
which they have maintained in every age;
and viz., the absolute liberty of conscience and belief, and the freest expression of them.
We would fight as soon to vindicate religious liberty in this country,
to an idolatrous Chinese or a Jew, as to a Baptist.
We would not, had we the absolute power to do so,
forbid Pedobaptists, or Campbellites, or Mormons from preaching,
and the fullest enjoyment of their religious rights;
but do most positively deny that they have any scriptural right to exist as churches of Christ:
we do deny their claims to be called or treated as churches of Christ;
we do deny the scripturalness of either their doctrines, or other ordinances,
and their authority to ordain ministers of the gospel,
precisely as we would the right of the lodge, or Young Men’s Christian Associations,
should they assume to do so.
We do deny that their ministers have any more authority to preach the gospel
and administer church ordinances, than the officers of lodges have, by virtue of their office;
but, in saying this, we make no allusion to their personal Christian characters whatever.
All the members and officers of a lodge might be true Christians,
but that would not constitute the lodge a Christian church,
or is officers Christian ministers.
The only force we would bring to bear against Pedobaptists, and Campbellites, and Mormons,
to put an end to their existence as churches, or to their ministers to arrest their preaching,
is the sword of truth, wielded in the dauntless spirit of Paul and the love of Christ.
We would convert them from the error of their ways,
and bring them all, by the force of moral suasion, into sweet subjection to the Law of Christ.
We would exterminate the isms by converting the ists.
We may as well notice here Mark 9:28,
which our would-be undenominational brethren constantly quote as proof positive,
that we should not oppose in anyway,
but rather encourage all religious teachers, of even manifest errors,
to propagate their false doctrine
so long as they claim to be religious teachers and the friends and followers of Christ.
The Apostles forbade a person to cast out devils in the name of Christ,
because he did not follow them!
The Protestant commentators have generally made all possible use of this passage
to support their cause as against the pretensions of the Romish church,
and Baptists have been influenced to use it against the advocates of apostolic succession,
who claim that no one is authorized to preach unless ordained in the succession;
and now "liberal Baptists," who would recognize all sects as equally "Christian churches,"
and all the ministers of those sects as "evangelical ministers,"
and bid them God-speed—quote it against Landmarkers.
But the passage yields them no encouragement
to disrespect and violate the order which Christ established,
and the positive injunctions of Paul.
This man, whom John and his fellow apostles saw casting out devils, in the name of Christ,
was certainly not an enemy of Christ,
and could not have been doing anything contrary to His will or authority,
or he could not have cast out devils.
He was undoubtedly either one of John’s disciples,
or one of the seventy who had been authorized by Christ Himself
to do this very miracle when He sent them forth;
and this man may have continued to proclaim the mission of Jesus,
and to cast out devils.
He was, most unquestionably, a disciple of Christ,
though not one of the apostles, and therefore, had been baptized.
The only irregularity complained of by John was,
that he followed not Christ continually,
as the apostles were required to do,
to qualify them for their work after the ascension of Christ;
but it was not required of him, nor of any other disciple of Christ, save the twelve,
to follow Christ constantly.
That this man was a friend and disciple of Christ,
is established by the great faith he had in Him as Messiah or the Son of God—
greater than the Apostles themselves were at times able to exercise.
(See Matt 17:16-22).
Will a Baptist, therefore, in the exercise of impartial candor,
claim that this passage warrants him in maintaining that anyone,
irrespective of baptism or church relations, or faith in the doctrine of Christ,
is authorized to go forth and preach his erroneous views in the name of Christ,
and to administer church ordinances,
and that we must bid him God-speed,
and thus endorse his doctrinal errors which are subversive of true Christianity,
and his irregularities totally subversive of the church and kingdom of Christ.
Let all who desire to believe this know of a certainty
that Christ never set up a kingdom and divided it against itself,
nor can it be that "the house of God, which is the church of the living God"
is divided against itself.
The following are indisputable facts:
1. That without scriptural baptism there can be no Christian church,
and consequently no scriptural ministers,
and no scriptural ordinances.
2. That sprinkling and pouring of water upon persons, adults, and infants,
as a sacrament of salvation,
is not scriptural baptism,
but as gross a perversion of it,
as it is to administer it in order to procure the remission of sins.
It is a stern and solemn fact—
3. That we, as Baptists, can not by our words or acts
declare that Pedobaptists or Campbellites societies are scriptural churches,
or their teachers scriptural ministers,
or their ordinances scriptural,
without testifying to that we know to be untrue,
and without lending all our influence to support and bid "God-speed"
to their false and pernicious teachings,
and thus becoming partakers of their wrongdoing—
as guilty in the sight of God as they themselves are.
What is the mission of Landmark Baptist?
1. As Baptists, we are to stand for the supreme authority of the New Testament
as our only and sufficient rule of faith and practice.
The New Testament, and that alone, as opposed to all human tradition in matters,
both of faith and practice,
we must claim as containing the distinguishing doctrine of our denomination—
a doctrine for which we are called earnestly to contend.
2. As Baptists, we are to stand for the ordinances of Christ
as He enjoined them upon His followers,
the same in number, and mode, and order, and in symbolic meaning, unchanged and unchangeable till He come.
3. As Baptists, we are to stand for a spiritual and regenerated church,
and that none shall be received into Christ’s church,
or be welcomed to its ordinances,
without confessing a personal faith in Christ,
and giving credible evidence of piety.
The motto on our banner is:
Christ Before the Church, Blood Before Water.
4. To protest, and to use all our influence against the recognition,
on the part of Baptists,
of human societies as scriptural churches,
by affiliation, ministerial or ecclesiastical,
or any alliance or co-operation
that is susceptible of being apparently or logically construed by our members, or theirs, or the world,
into a recognition of their ecclesiastical or ministerial equality with Baptist churches.
5. To preserve and perpetuate the doctrine of the divine origin and sanctity of the churches of Christ,
and the unbroken continuity of Christ’s kingdom,
"from the days of John the Baptist until now," according to the express words of Christ.
6. To preserve and perpetuate the divine, inalienable, and sole prerogatives of a Christian church --
1, To preach the gospel of the son of God;
2, To select and ordain her own officers;
3, To control absolutely her own ordinances.
?
7. To preserve and perpetuate the scriptural design of baptism,
and its validity and recognition only when scripturally administered by a gospel church.
8. To preserve and perpetuate the true design and symbolism of the Lord’s Supper,
as a local church ordinance,
and for but one purpose—
the commemoration of the sacrificial death of Christ—
and not as a denominational ordinance, or as an act expressive of our Christian or personal fellowship,
and much less of courtesy towards others.
9. To preserve and perpetuate the doctrine of a divinely called
and scripturally qualified and ordained ministry,
to proclaim the gospel, and to administer the ordinances,
not upon their own responsibility, but for, and under the direction of, local churches alone.
10. To preserve and perpetuate that primitive fealty and faithfulness to the truth,
that shunned not to declare the whole counsel of God,
and to teach man to observe all things whatsoever Christ commanded to be believed and obeyed.
Not the belief and advocacy of one or two of these principles as the marks of the divinely patterned church,
but the cordial reception and advocacy of all of them, constitute a full "Old Landmark Baptist."
CHAPTER XII - - - - - Old Landmarkism, J.R. Graves
